Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Conterio

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1942No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 41,963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Edwin Anderson, Jr., brought an action for damages against defendants Battista Conterio and Gogebic Auto Company, a Michigan corporation, because of injuries suffered in an accident sometime between the hours of 8 p.m., July 10,1940, and 1 a.m., July 11,1940, while he was an occupant of a motor vehicle being driven by defendant Conterio. Plaintiff claimed that at the time of the.accident Conterio was in the performance of his duties as a salesman or agent of defendant Gogebic Company and was then demonstrating to plaintiff an automobile for the purpose of effecting a sale.

Conterio…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGuire v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Morris v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Stehouwer v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sutton v. BenjaminMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Pietrantonio v. Tonn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fera v. Village Plaza, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sloan v. Kramer-Orloff Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Shuler v. Michigan Physicians Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Collins v. RydmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API