Legal Opinion

Seide v. Shalala

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1998No. Civ.A. 98-3872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

Charles Seide (“Plaintiff’) has brought this appeal seeking judicial review of the effective date on which his mandatory five year exclusion from participation in Medicare and state health care programs begins to run. Presently before the Court is Donna E. Shalala’s (“Defendant”), the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Alternately Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the decision of Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Joseph K. Riotto is affirmed.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Douglas GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Figueroa v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  3. Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API