Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 13, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2028 (ESH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael Friedman, Paul Goldenheim, and Howard Udell seek review of a final decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary” or “the Department”) excluding them from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for twelve years. The Secretary’s exclusion decision was based on plaintiffs’ misdemeanor guilty pleas to charges that they served as “responsible corporate officers” of the Purdue Frederick Company during a five-and-a-half-year period in which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michael Friedman v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Michael Friedman v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012