Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 13, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2009-2028Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) MICHAEL FRIEDMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2028 (ESH) ) KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, ) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Michael Friedman, Paul Goldenheim, and Howard Udell seek review of a final decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary” or “the Department”) excluding them from participation in Medicare,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API