Legal Opinion
Cambridge Management Co. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 3, 1986No. 84-1415PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Cambridge Management Company (CMC) petitions for review of the Rental Housing Commission’s decision that its property is not exempt from the Rent Control Act. D.C.Code § 45-1501 et seq. (1981). 1 CMC argues that its principals only owned four rental units each and did not have any interest in any other rental unit within the meaning of D.C.Code § 45-1516(a)(3). 2 We agree, reverse and remand.
On May 1, 1980, Anthony and Cecilia Wysocki (husband and wife), Joseph Wy-socki, Richard Ressa, and Leon Penman purchased three buildings and lots at 4000, 4004 and 4008 8th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gibson v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- White v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bernstein v. LimeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Revithes v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tenants of 738 Longfellow Street, N.W. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990