Legal Opinion
Woods v. Oak Park Chateau Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 31, 1950No. 9821_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
This is another action in which plaintiff, pursuant to § 206(b) of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq., sued defendants to enjoin them from charging and collecting over-ceiling rents, and for a refund of all amounts collected in excess of the maximum rents established by the Housing Expediter pursuant to the Act. The premises involved are within the Chicago Defense-Rental area, and consist of a 14-story fireproof building containing 130 dwelling units.' The defense pleaded was that the Act violated the Fifth Amendment to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Shapiro v. RubensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Maher v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Fritz Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
- Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Charlesbank Apartments, Inc. v. Boston Rent Control AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.