Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamilton

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 21, 1992No. ACMR 9100707PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, he was found guilty of aggravated assault, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 928 (1982). Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of failure to obey a lawful general regulation, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892 (1982). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for two months, and forfeiture of $502.00 pay per month for two months. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. CzekalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. DireU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. LopezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. NormentU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API