Legal Opinion
United States v. Czekala
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided August 25, 1993No. ACMR 9102675PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Senior Judge:
Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of conspiracy to violate a regulation, violation of a lawful general regulation, three specifications of perjury, presenting a false claim, three specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer, and obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 81, 92, 131, 132, 133, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 892, 931, 932, 933, and 934 (1988). He was sentenced to dismissal, confinement for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. CzekalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- Able v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. ZanderNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. HarrisArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. CzekalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.