Legal Opinion

United States v. Norment

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1993No. ACMR 9001079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of three specifications of indecent assault and one specification of wrongful solicitation to commit adultery, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, total forfeitures, and reduction to Private El. The convening authority approved the sentence. This Court affirmed the sentence.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. PayneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. GroceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pittman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API