Legal Opinion

Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. Kiger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1989No. 89-227PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondents’ motion to dismiss is untimely and also ill-conceived because it argues the merits of relators’ request for a writ of mandamus instead of attacking the sufficiency of the complaint. For purposes of a Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss, the material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted. State, ex rel. Alford, v. Willoughby Civil Serv. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 221, 223, 12 O.O. 3d 229, 230, 390 N.E. 2d 782, 785. Then, “[i]n order for a court to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * * *, it must appear beyond doubt…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API