Legal Opinion
In Re Vitale
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 21, 1989No. 87-312PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Petitioner appeals a decision of the Environmental Board (Board) determining that petitioner was subject to Act 250 jurisdiction in the development of his commercial enterprise. We affirm.
I
The facts are not in dispute. On February 10, 1985, petitioner entered into an agreement to purchase 1.57 acres of land in Rut-land Town for use as a site for his concrete step manufacturing business. Petitioner agreed to pay $7,500 for the land, and a closing date was set. On the advice of petitioner’s counsel, petitioner *581and the sellers agreed to delay the closing so that the property could be subdivided…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family EnterprisesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.