In Re Denio
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Appellants Chester and Bertha Denio appeal a decision of the Vermont Environmental Board granting an Act 250 permit for a three-lot subdivision adjacent to an already existing 71-lot subdivision, but imposing twenty conditions. The De nios contest the Board’s exercise of jurisdiction and claim that the Board (1) misalloeated the burden of proof on the issue of aesthetics; (2) made findings of fact and conclusions of law which were not based exclusively on the evidence before it and were erroneous; and (3) set unreasonable conditions for the new lots. We affirm.
In 1972, appellants purchased…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re McShinskySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- City of South Burlington v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re KostenblattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Leo P. Pratt, III v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In Re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.