United States v. David Monahan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
David Monahan appeals from a cocaine conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846. He claims that the district court improperly admitted evidence of his prior con-. viction for obstructing justice, which resulted from his threat of unspecified harm to a key witness should the witness testify in the cocaine case. * The court stated that the evidence was admitted to show consciousness of guilt rather than propensity for crime. Monahan refused the court’s offer to give a limiting instruction to the jury. Monahan now argues that under Rule 403 the probative value of this evidence is outweighed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Sandy CheckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Louis CirilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Gerald George Weir, United States of America v. Daniel Wesley DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- United States v. Anthony J. PinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Donald SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State v. SchurzArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Jorge Mendez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.