Legal Opinion

United States v. David Monahan

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 21, 1980No. 80-1059PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

David Monahan appeals from a cocaine conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846. He claims that the district court improperly admitted evidence of his prior con-. viction for obstructing justice, which resulted from his threat of unspecified harm to a key witness should the witness testify in the cocaine case. * The court stated that the evidence was admitted to show consciousness of guilt rather than propensity for crime. Monahan refused the court’s offer to give a limiting instruction to the jury. Monahan now argues that under Rule 403 the probative value of this evidence is outweighed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Sandy CheckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Louis CirilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Gerald George Weir, United States of America v. Daniel Wesley DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. United States v. Anthony J. PinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Donald SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. SchurzArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States v. Jorge Mendez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API