Legal Opinion
United States v. Brashier
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1976No. Nos. 75-3375, 75-3453PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Brashier and Coughlan appeal their convictions for criminal violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Act)1 as the result of illegal concurrent investments. Brashier also appeals a judgment of conviction for filing a false 1971 federal income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1).2
Appellants raise numerous issues on appeal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
FACTS
1. The Transaction.
Viewing the facts, as we must, in the light most favorable to the government, the jury could have found that the appellants were involved in a complex…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Serafin Alfonso, Humberto Rayo, Fabian Mora, Primo Antonio Serrano-TellezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.