Legal Opinion

United States v. Jorge Mendez-Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1987No. 85-3975PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Jorge Mendez-Ortiz was convicted of conspiracy “to possess with intent to distribute quantities of heroin” in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On appeal defendant argues that the district court committed reversible error by admitting testimony from a government witness which indicated that defendant had threatened and attempted to bribe the witness and by refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of indirect entrapment. Finding no merit in these arguments, we affirm.

I

In late 1984, Special Agent Richard Stuart of the Drug Enforcement Administration…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API