Legal Opinion
Tower Acton Holdings, LLC v. Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 37
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 2003No. B147571PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Introduction
Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 37 (District) was sued by Tower Acton Holdings, LLC (Tower) and Sierra Highway Partners, LLC (Sierra) for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing allegedly implied by that contract. The contract in question was a master service agreement (MSA) entered into in-1989 by District and certain developers—not plaintiffs.
The MSA related to the creation of a water system (the Acton III Water Improvements), which was to be financed by bonds sold by a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- 20th Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- OSUMI v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
- Sleep EZ v. MateoCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
- Sleep EZ v. MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017