Legal Opinion

Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 2016No. B264861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLLINS, J.—

INTRODUCTION

A film industry worker was seriously injured on a film set. His employer had two primary insurance policies with Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, and an excess insurance policy with Ace American Insurance Company. The injured worker sued, Fireman’s Fund defended the case, and the case eventually settled with the participation of and contributions from both insurers.

Ace American then sued Fireman’s Fund for equitable subrogation, alleging that the injured worker initially offered to settle his case within the limits of the Fireman’s Fund policies, and that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorroh v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  2. North River Insurance Company v. James River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC V. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Center for Environmental Health v. Perrigo Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. NORTH RIVER INS. CO. v. JAMES RIVER INS. CO. (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API