Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Rural Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1971No. 250PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

On the issues raised as to jurisdiction and venue, the facts stated in the complaint are, at the demurrer stage, assumed to be true. Facts, thus alleged and thus accepted, are:(1) Plaintiffs are residents of the state of Missouri.(2) Defendant Rural Mutual is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of business in Dane county, Wisconsin.(3) Defendant Guth was a resident of Marinette county, Wisconsin, but his present whereabouts are unknown.(4) Defendant Rural Mutual is the liability insurer of defendant Guth under a policy issued in Wisconsin and delivered in Marinette county,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oertel v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Isaksen v. Chesapeake Instrument Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State ex rel. Hammer v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Boyd v. AaronsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biggart v. BarstadCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. Kenison v. Wellington InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  3. Milwaukee County v. Hartford Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API