Legal Opinion

Oertel v. Williams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 5, 1933:

Fritz, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of New York, brought this action to recover $20,000 for injuries sustained by him on September 3, 1932, in a collision in Indiana, which plaintiff alleges was caused by negligence of the defendant Williams in operating his automobile. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York was joined as defendant because at the time of the collision there was in force and effect an *70automobile liability insurance policy which it had issued to Williams on February 12, 1932, in Wisconsin, which was then his place of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. McAdamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Morgan v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bergstein v. PopkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Witt v. Realist, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lasecki v. KabaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hunt v. DollarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API