Legal Opinion

Kenison v. Wellington Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 21, 1998No. 97-1758PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Wellington Insurance Company appeals a nonfinal order denying its motion for summary judgment. Wellington contends it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Jerald and Darlene Kenison cannot maintain a direct action against it under Wisconsin statutes because Wellington did not deliver or issue for delivery a policy of insurance in this state. We agree and therefore reverse the trial court's denial of Wellington's motion for summary judgment.

The facts of the case are not disputed. Jerald Kenison sustained injuries in an automobile accident that occurred in Superior, Wisconsin, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cords v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Frye v. AngstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Lexington Insurance Company v. Rugg & Knopp, Inc., and the Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Donald R. Wild and Diana H. Wild v. Subscription Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Casper v. American International South InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Koscielak v. Stockbridge-Munsee CommunityCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  5. Casper v. American International South InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API