Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boyd v. Aarons

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Relator contends that Milwaukee county is not the proper place for the trial of this action, and relies to establish this proposition upon the provisions of sec. 261.01 (11), Stats. This section reads as follows:

“261.01 Place of trial. Except as provided in section 220.12 and subject to the provisions for change of venue the proper place of trial of civil actions is as follows: . . .
“(11) Auto accident actions. Of an action growing out of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the county in which the cause of action arose or where the defendant resides.”

Relator claims that since he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Holm v. ColmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cespuglio v. CespuglioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kujawa v. American Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bowman v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API