Legal Opinion

State v. Bonham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 10-91-03403; CA A72941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*373DEITS, J.

The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in the search of his vehicle. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the defendant’s consent to the officer’s request to search the vehicle was properly obtained. We reverse.

We take the facts from the trial court’s findings of fact and draw such inferences from those facts as are consistent with the trial court’s ultimate conclusion. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). Oregon State Police Officer Ayres activated the overhead lights on his patrol vehicle and stopped defendant on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API