Legal Opinion
State v. Robinette
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1995No. 1994-1143PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 650.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROBINETTE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Robinette,
1995-Ohio-162.] Criminal law—Motor vehicles—Continued detention of a person stopped for a traffic violation constitutes an illegal seizure, when—Police officer required to inform motorist that his legal detention has concluded before the police officer may engage in any consensual interrogation. 1. When the motivation behind a police officer’s continued detention of a person stopped for a traffic violation is not related to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Davis, Unpublished Decision (6-30-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Lynch, Unpublished Decision (9-17-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004