Oklahoma City v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Chief Justice.
Defendants in error, referred to as plaintiffs, were involved in a two-car accident with an employee of the City of Oklahoma City, At the time of the accident, the employee was operating a vehicle belonging to City and was in the course of his employment. Plaintiffs commenced separate actions against the employee and City to recover damages resulting from the accident. The two actions were consolidated and the jury returned a verdict in favor of both plaintiffs against the employee and City. Judgment was rendered in conformity with the verdicts. The employee did not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Booth Tank Co. v. SymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Lane v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- City of Ardmore v. HendrixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- City of Ardmore v. StuchulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Young v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Newman v. STATE EX REL. BOARD OF REGENTS, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Newman v. State ex rel. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical CollegesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Oklahoma City v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.