Legal Opinion

City of Ardmore v. Stuchul

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1955No. 36913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff, R. S. Stuchul, brought suit against the defendant, City of Ardmore, for damages to his automobile, alleging that defendant was a municipal corporation under Oklahoma law; that he was driving his automobile on a certain street in the City of Ardmore; that defendant through its agent, servant and employee was then engaged in dragging the street with certain machinery which was used for that purpose; that in dragging said street the dirt was brought from the side of the street into and spread upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Estate of Nah-Me-Tsa-He v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Oklahoma City v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. Burke v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Williams v. City of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API