Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. City of Stillwater

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1983No. 58876PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The first-impression question before us, tendering for construction an exclusionary provision in The Oklahoma Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act [Act], 1 is: Do the terms of 51 O.S.1981 § 155(14), which except from governmental liability “[a]ny claim covered by the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Act ... ”, 2 bar from recovery, not only one who, when injured, was a covered employee of the political subdivision sued in tort, but also all those who may claim compensation from anyone for the injurious event sought to be redressed? We hold that the § 155(14) exclusion bars only…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Wentz v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Nguyen v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. O'DELL v. Town of Gauley BridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API