Priest v. Brown
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to subject certain real property in the city of San Francisco to the payment of a judgment obtained by him against the defendant, Joseph Brown, on April 5, 1887, for the sum of $8,334.06 and costs of suit. It is alleged in the complaint that this real property was on October 3, 1883, conveyed by the judgment debtor to the defendant A. M. Brown, with intent to delay and defraud the creditors of such debtor. The land was afterwards conveyed to the other defendants named, in trust to secure an indebtedness owing from the said A. M. Brown to the San…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cohen v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Giddings v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Jolly v. KyleOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Cohen v. LevyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PostedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.