Legal Opinion

Bauder v. Tyrrel

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 7,274PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from an order granting a new trial in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Redman, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

This is an action brought by a married woman against the defendant, a Sheriff, to recover personal property. The defense is that the property belonged to plaintiff’s husband, and was seized for his debt. The Court below, a District Court, gave judgment for plaintiff. A motion for new trial was made, which was heard before the Superior Court of the County, the successor of the District Court, and was granted. The notice of the motion did not state that the defendant would move to have the decision vacated, neither did the order granting the new trial state in terms that the decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wittenbrock v. BellmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Fulton v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Altschul v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Locke v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Jones v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API