Legal Opinion
Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 2011No. A09-1506PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Appellants Bruce and Cindy Thompson (Thompsons) filed a claim for basic economic loss benefits against their insurer, respondent Western National Insurance Company (Western National), arising out of injuries they sustained in an automobile accident. Western National paid some benefits to the Thompsons, and then a dispute arose over the Thompsons’ obligation to attend examinations under oath requested by Western National. The Thompsons filed for no-fault arbitration, and Western National moved to stay the arbitrations and brought a declaratory judgment action in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, Thomas Bennerotte, Jed Benjamin Iverson, Gabriel Johnson, Michael Fay, Brad Ratgen, Landon Barakow, Lebertha PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.