Legal Opinion
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 2012No. A11-1145PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
In this dispute regarding a valued fire-insurance policy, appellant Auto-Owners *196Insurance Company contends that the district court erred in denying its motion to compel respondent Second Chance Investments LLC to submit the determination as to whether the insured property suffered a total loss to an appraisal panel.
FACTS
Second Chance purchased residential real property in Minnetrista, Minnesota, and obtained fire insurance on the property from Auto-Owners. Consistent with Minnesota’s standard fire insurance policy, the Auto-Owners policy provided for payment of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Farm Lloyds v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Selective Ins. Co. of S.C. v. SelaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Galaxy Wireless, LLC v. Western National Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Maplebrook Estates Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Maplebrook Estates Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.