Legal Opinion
Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 2012No. A11-1520PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
The district court consolidated numerous individual auto-glass repair or replacement payment claims assigned to respondent auto-glass company for purposes of arbitration against appellant insurer. The arbitrator issued an award in favor of respondent that included preaward interest. Appellant moved to vacate the award, arguing that the arbitrator exceeded his authority and erred by awarding preaward interest. The district court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.
FACTS
Respondent Garlyn, Inc., d/b/a Polzin Glass (Polzin), repairs and replaces auto glass.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Davies v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- In re the Estate of RuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Safelite Group, Inc. v. RothmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Alpine Glass, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Western National Insurance Co. v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.