Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D.M.K.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1984No. C4-83-1277PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order adjudicating juvenile D.M.K. delinquent for violating Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1982) (felony theft). The principal issue raised on appeal is whether there was sufficient corroboration of certain accomplice testimony to support a finding that D.M.K. committed felony theft. D.M.K. also contends that certain testimony relating to a bank withdrawal was improperly admitted by the trial court. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 13, 1983, the St. Cloud Police Department filed a delinquency petition alleging that D.M.K. stole a Honda “three-wheeler”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. State v. MatousekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Welfare of D.K.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.H.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API