Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1960No. 37,474PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Ernest Armstrong was accused of robbery in the first degree and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge. Prior to defendant’s entry of his plea, pursuant to a motion by the county attorney, the court entered its order substituting the name of Ernest Armstrong for the name of Richard Roe. The transcript indicates that during the trial Ernest Armstrong was referred to as Ernest L. Armstrong, Ernest Bubba Armstrong, and Bubba Armstrong, without any attempt at correction or objection on the part of the defense.

Defendant was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. State v. PankratzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. State v. OukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API