In Re the Welfare of S.H.H.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

Appellant challenges his delinquency adjudication after a trial arising from an incident of damage to property, claiming that the district court’s determination of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is based entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Because we find that the testimony at issue was the testimony of an accomplice and because it was uncorroborated by any other evidence on the record, we reverse.

FACTS

While Kenneth Oraskovich was getting a haircut, the back window of his truck was shattered. He called the police to investigate the matter. When…