Legal Opinion

State v. Strother

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. CO-84-346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*876OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant Frank Strother was convicted by a jury of aiding, advising or conspiring to commit a simple robbery in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.24 and 609.05 (1982). He contends the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction because it fails to show he intentionally aided in the robbery. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On the night of February 21, 1983, the Minneapolis Police Department established a street crime decoy unit near Hennepin Avenue in downtown Minneapolis. Officer William James acted as the decoy, pretending to be drunk. He carried eleven…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re the Welfare of D.M.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API