Hanson v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying postconviction relief. Fred Hanson was convicted of two counts of burglary and one count of theft. Hanson contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to convict because the circumstantial evidence did not exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, inferences other than guilt and because the testimony of an accomplice was not corroborated; (2) the trial court improperly admitted evidence seized under a search warrant issued upon information obtained in an earlier illegal search; and (3) the prosecutor made a prejudicial opening…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ThreinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. Ngoc Van VuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Barness v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Headbird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SirekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MouselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985