Legal Opinion
Carey v. Powell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1949No. 30705PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, C. J.
This action was instituted by Silas M. Carey and Lela Carey, his wife, against George Powell, executor of the last will and testament of Florence Ryan, deceased, and George Powell and Noma Powell, his wife, for the purpose of obtaining a decree of specific performance of a certain contract made and entered into April 19, 1944, by and between Florence Ryan, a widow, as first party, and Lela M. Carey and Silas M. Carey, second parties.
George Powell appeared and filed an answer and cross-complaint, as executor of the estate of Florence Ryan, deceased. George Powell and Noma Powell, his wife,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osborn v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Co. v. Brazier Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Thomas v. HenselWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Wakefield v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Levas v. DeweyWashington Supreme Court · 1949