Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1936No. 26291. Department OnePublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court granting a widow’s pension, in a proceeding arising out of the workmen’s compensation act and tried before the court without a jury.

On April 2, 1930, Charles Wesley McFarland, then sixty-six years of age, was engaged in extrahazardous work and, during the course of his employment on that day, sustained a fracture of the right femur. His claim for compensation was recognized, and provision for Ms time loss and medical aid was made, by the department of labor and industries. The claim was closed by order of the supervisor of the department…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beels v. Department of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Gatterdam v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wintermute v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. O'Connor v. SlatterWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Brucker v. De HartWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Harbor Plywood Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Jones v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Jones v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API