Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hensel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1951No. 31544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

This action was instituted to compel specific performance of an oral contract to devise certain real property and bequeath the personal property located thereon. According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff was employed by Levi H. Hensel, referred to herein as Hensel, to perform household and nursing services during the last illness of Mrs. Hensel. This employment began in January, 1939, and continued, at an agreed compensation, for somewhat more than a month, when Mrs. Hensel died. Hensel then orally promised plaintiff that, if she would continue on as his housekeeper, he would,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Henry v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Blodgett v. LoweWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Olsen v. HoagWashington Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ferris v. BlumhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. GROUP HEALTH ETC. v. King Co. Med. Soc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hagen v. MesserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Ferris v. BlumhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API