Legal Opinion

Atlas Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 10, 1955No. C. D. 1736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

This case was initiated through the filing of a protest, the essential parts of which, for the purposes of this opinion, were as follows:

Protest is hereby made against your liquidation or your decision assessing, imposing or collecting duty, fees, or other exactions, * * * in connection with the entries or other matters referred to below. The reasons for objection under the tariff act of 1930, and any amendments thereto, are as follows:

All the merchandise assessed at 35% par. 1519, should be classified at 25% par. 1519.

You classified similar merchandise covered by Dutiable Entry…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Arista Oil Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Gleeson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API