Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Rolled Thread Die Co., Subsidiary of Utd Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 5, 1970No. 7589_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent undertakes the very considerable burden of demonstrating the lack of substantial evidence on the rec ord as a whole to support the Board s conclusion, 179 N.L.R.B. No. 6 (1969), that it has dominated, interfered with, and unlawfully assisted its Plant Committee and that Committee’s employee component, the Factory Workers Group.
For some twenty years respondent’s labor-management functions have largely been exercised within the framework of a Plant Committee, the management members being the President and Personnel Manager and the seven employee representatives being the “Factory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coppus Engineering Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Prince MacAroni Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Unit Drop Forge Division Eaton, Yale & Towne, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Love Box Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Katz v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Northeastern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Electromation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Classic Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Electromation, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994