Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. U.S. Capitol Police Board
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2004No. 01-810 (RJL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEON, District Judge.
Before the Court are the defendant U.S. Capitol Police Board’s two motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint. 1 The two plaintiffs in this case, LaVerne Johnson Reynolds and Kennieth Thompson, seek declaratory and injunctive relief and damages for claims of discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and disability and for retaliation / hostile work environment in violation of the Congressional Accountability Act. 2 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1438. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the defendant’s motions regarding plaintiffs Thompson and Johnson…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brink v. Xe Holding, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Peavey v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- ATSI Commc'ns v. Shaar Fund ATSI Commc'ns v. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Calderon-Lopez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Eastern Elec. v. FERD Const., et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.