Legal Opinion
Brink v. Xe Holding, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1733PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, thirty-one civilian government contractor employees (and/or their surviving relatives), bring this purported class action against twenty-three defendants, which include United States government contractors (the “Contractor Defendants”) and their insurance carriers (the “Insurer Defendants”)(eolleetively, “Defendants”). 1 Plaintiffs allege violations of the Long-shore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 948a, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq., the Americans with…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Daniel Brink v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Mercadante v. Xe Services, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- BRINK v. XE HOLDING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.