Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance Companies

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1986No. 16765PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The sole issue on appeal is whether an insurer’s subrogration clause for medical payments paid under an insured’s automobile insurance policy is void as violative of public policy. We hold that a subrogation clause under which the insurer obtains subro-gation rights from its insured for medical payments violates public policy. Accordingly, we reverse.

THE FACTS

Jimmie Brown and appellant Roger L. Maxwell were in an automobile accident. Brown was injured. Maxwell was liable for Brown’s injuries. Respondent Allstate Insurance Companies was Brown’s insurer. Appellant Farmers Insurance…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Davenport v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DrukeArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Canfora v. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McConnell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API