Porter v. . International Bridge Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal by the International Bridge Company and the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 3, 1909, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term; also, appeal by the city of Buffalo from the same judgment of the Appellate Division affirming the same Special Term judgment which is…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the International Bridge Company and the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 3, 1909, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term; also, appeal by the city of Buffalo from the same judgment of the Appellate Division affirming the same Special Term judgment which is final as to that defendant. In 1830 the eight owners of a tract of land of 500 acres near the village of Black Bock, known…
1Opinion of the CourtWillard Bartlett, J.
In the consideration of this appeal I think it is essential at the outset to ascertain precisely what is the character of the action. The case has already been before this court twice: First, on an appeal from a judgment affirming an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint for misjoinder of causes of action (163 N. Y. 79); and, secondly, on an appeal from an order reversing an order directing a jury trial of the issues involved in the action. (175 N. Y. 467.) Upon the first appeal, Judge Martin, speaking for the court, said : “ After a careful examination of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- City of Cohoes v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Griffith v. AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- President of Middlebury College v. Central Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.