Legal Opinion

Drayton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1988No. Appeal No. 2436 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

The sole issue before us in this workmens compensation appeal is whether attorneys fees should be assessed against Fruehauf Corp. (Employer) for failure to establish a reasonable basis for its contest of Leon Draytons (Claimants) claim for benefits.1 The referee awarded counsel fees; the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversed. We now reverse.

At the hearing held on October 22, 1984, the Claimant described the circumstances surrounding two work-related injuries to his back. The first occurred December 19, 1983, when Claimant experienced back pain on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Edmond v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Kuney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Yeagle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Franklin Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API