Legal Opinion
Kuney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 1989No. 1954 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARBIERI, Senior Judge.
George C. Kuney (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) insofar as it reversed the referee’s assessment of counsel fees against Respondents, Continental Data Systems (Continental) and its insurance carrier, PMA Insurance Company (PMA), pursuant to Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act 1 (Act). Issues presented for review pertain to whether Respondents established a reasonable basis to contest liability. The Board’s decision is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Claimant, a computer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Investors Diversified Services & Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Howar) (Hoar)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kuney v. PMA InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Ricks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Parkway Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Lewistown Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.