Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1594 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The sole issue in this claimant’s appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is whether the compensation authorities erred in failing to award him attorney’s fees.

The claimant sustained an injury to the cornea of his right eye in the course of his employment by Firestone Tire & Rubber Company. He spent eight or nine *563days in the hospital where surgery was performed on his eye. He eventually returned to his former employment without loss of wages; he remained, however, under his physician’s care, including periodic examination for cataract of the injured eye and for possible…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Hartman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API