Legal Opinion
Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 24, 1991No. 624 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
Charles Majesky (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which deleted from a referee’s decision an award of counsel fees based on unreasonable contest, pursuant to Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. 1
Claimant, while employed by Transit America, Inc. (The Budd Co.) (employer), sustained a work-related injury on April 19, 1982. Over the course of the ensuing three years, several final receipts and supplemental agreements were signed, culminating in a supplemental agreement dated April 10, 1985, which acknowledged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Kuney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Smith v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Delaware Valley Fish Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lewistown Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bates v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.