Legal Opinion
Woods v. Corsey
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1948No. Civ. 16370PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 205e of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (56 Stats. 23 as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. App. §901 et seq.), the administrator of the Office of Price Administration brought this action against Agnes Corsey, James Hayes and Hazel Slaughter, to recover treble damages for collection of excessive rents in violation of section 4 of that act, and of the rent regulations issued by the administrator in the Los Angeles Defense Rental Area. Agnes Corsey and James Hayes were the oper ators of the-premises in question; Hazel Slaughter was their manager. Defendants were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berkeley Lawn Bowling Club v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- California Packing Corp. v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Gottlieb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Branker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gayton v. LebedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.